View Filing Data

Document and Entity Information - shares	9 Months Ended
Document and Entity Information - shares	Sep. 30, 2018	Oct. 25, 2018
Document And Entity Information [Abstract]
Entity Registrant Name	Revance Therapeutics, Inc.
Entity Central Index Key	0001479290
Current Fiscal Year End Date	--12-31
Entity Filer Category	Accelerated Filer
Document Type	10-Q
Document Period End Date	Sep. 30, 2018
Document Fiscal Year Focus	2018
Document Fiscal Period Focus	Q3
Amendment Flag	false
Entity Common Stock, Shares Outstanding		36,987,667
Entity Emerging Growth Company	true
Entity Small Business	false
Entity Ex Transition Period	false

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets (Unaudited) - USD ($) $ in Thousands	Sep. 30, 2018	Dec. 31, 2017
CURRENT ASSETS
Cash and cash equivalents	$ 45,132	$ 282,896
Short-term investments	163,260	0
Prepaid expenses and other current assets	7,492	2,315
Total current assets	215,884	285,211
Property and equipment, net	13,493	9,250
Restricted cash	730	580
Other non-current assets	2,944	658
TOTAL ASSETS	233,051	295,699
CURRENT LIABILITIES
Accounts payable	7,341	6,805
Accruals and other current liabilities	15,718	12,225
Deferred revenue, current portion	8,749	0
Financing obligations	0	1,872
Total current liabilities	31,808	20,902
Derivative liability associated with Medicis settlement	2,763	2,613
Deferred revenue, net of current portion	13,009	0
Deferred rent	3,373	3,339
TOTAL LIABILITIES	50,953	26,854
Commitments and Contingencies (Note 8)
STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Common stock, par value $0.001 per share — 95,000,000 shares authorized as of September 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017; 36,992,122 and 36,516,075 shares issued and outstanding as of September 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, respectively	37	37
Additional paid-in capital	826,352	810,975
Accumulated other comprehensive loss	(133)	0
Accumulated deficit	(644,158)	(542,167)
TOTAL STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY	182,098	268,845
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY	$ 233,051	$ 295,699

Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations and Comprehensive Loss (Unaudited) - USD ($) $ in Thousands	3 Months Ended		9 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2018	Sep. 30, 2017	Sep. 30, 2018	Sep. 30, 2017
Income Statement [Abstract]
Revenue	$ 2,362	$ 75	$ 3,242	$ 225
Operating expenses:
Research and development	21,848	21,643	66,968	59,357
General and administrative	14,155	9,148	40,505	25,511
Total operating expenses	36,003	30,791	107,473	84,868
Loss from operations	(33,641)	(30,716)	(104,231)	(84,643)
Interest income	996	341	3,099	999
Interest expense	0	(104)	(44)	(439)
Change in fair value of derivative liability associated with Medicis settlement	(45)	(44)	(150)	(211)
Other expense, net	(144)	(128)	(626)	(386)
Net loss	(32,834)	(30,651)	(101,952)	(84,680)
Unrealized gain (loss) on available for sale securities	90	72	(133)	3
Comprehensive loss	(32,744)	(30,579)	(102,085)	(84,677)
Basic and Diluted net loss attributable to common stockholders	$ (32,834)	$ (30,651)	$ (101,952)	$ (84,680)
Basic and Diluted net loss per share attributable to common stockholders (Note 2) (in USD per share)	$ (0.91)	$ (1.01)	$ (2.82)	$ (2.86)
Basic and Diluted weighted-average number of shares used in computing net loss per share attributable to common stockholders (shares)	36,272,445	30,270,260	36,116,745	29,623,805

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited) - USD ($) $ in Thousands	9 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2018	Sep. 30, 2017
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Net loss	$ (101,952)	$ (84,680)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:
Depreciation	1,251	1,096
Amortization of premium (discount) on investment	(904)	382
Change in fair value of derivative liability associated with Medicis settlement	150	211
Stock-based compensation expense	12,422	9,820
Capitalized interest	(16)	(37)
Effective interest on financing obligations	44	217
Gain on disposal of fixed assets	(1,480)	0
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Prepaid expenses and other current assets	(5,141)	4,632
Other non-current assets	(1,919)	(488)
Accounts payable	793	2,749
Accruals and other liabilities	1,889	(848)
Deferred revenue	21,758	0
Net cash used in operating activities	(73,105)	(66,946)
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Purchases of property and equipment	(5,367)	(2,037)
Proceeds from maturities of investments	50,000	60,655
Proceeds from sales of property and equipment	1,537	0
Purchases of investments	(212,197)	(36,028)
Payment for acquisition of in-process research and development	(100)	(100)
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities	(166,127)	22,490
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Proceeds from issuance of common stock, net of at-the-market offering commissions	0	38,760
Principal payments made on financing obligations	(932)	(2,727)
Net settlement of restricted stock awards for employee taxes	(1,906)	(430)
Proceeds from the exercise of stock options and employee stock purchase plan	4,822	2,116
Payment of offering costs	(366)	(441)
Net cash provided by financing activities	1,618	37,278
NET DECREASE IN CASH, CASH EQUIVALENTS, AND RESTRICTED CASH	(237,614)	(7,178)
CASH, CASH EQUIVALENTS, AND RESTRICTED CASH — Beginning of period	283,476	64,082
CASH, CASH EQUIVALENTS, AND RESTRICTED CASH — Beginning of period	45,862	56,904
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION:
Cash paid for interest	16	259
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES OF NON-CASH INVESTING AND FINANCING INFORMATION:
Property and equipment purchases included in accounts payable and accruals and other current liabilities	920	429
Deferred offering costs	$ 0	$ 11

The Company and Basis of Presentation	9 Months Ended
The Company and Basis of Presentation	Sep. 30, 2018
Organization, Consolidation and Presentation of Financial Statements [Abstract]
The Company and Basis of Presentation	The Company and Basis of Presentation Revance Therapeutics, Inc., or the Company, was incorporated in Delaware on August 10, 1999 under the name Essentia Biosystems, Inc. The Company commenced operations in June 2002 and on April 19, 2005, changed its name to Revance Therapeutics, Inc. The Company is a clinical-stage biotechnology company focused on the development, manufacturing and commercialization of novel botulinum toxin products for multiple aesthetic and therapeutic indications. The Company is leveraging its proprietary portfolio of botulinum toxin type A compounds, formulated with its patented and proprietary peptide technology, to address unmet needs in large and growing neuromodulator markets. The Company's proprietary peptide technology enables delivery of botulinum toxin type A through two investigational drug product candidates, DaxibotulinumtoxinA for Injection (RT002), or RT002 injectable, and DaxibotulinumtoxinA Topical ("topical" or "our topical product candidate"). The Company is pursuing clinical development for RT002 injectable in a broad spectrum of aesthetic and therapeutic indications and is planning to conduct preclinical development of its topical product candidate. The Company holds worldwide rights for all indications of RT002 injectable and the pharmaceutical uses of its proprietary peptide technology. Since commencing operations in 2002, the Company has devoted substantially all of its efforts to identifying and developing product candidates for the aesthetic and therapeutic pharmaceutical markets, recruiting personnel and raising capital, and preclinical and clinical development of, and manufacturing development for, RT002 injectable and topical. The Company has never been profitable and has not yet commenced commercial operations. Since the Company's inception, the Company has incurred losses and negative cash flows from operations. The Company has not generated significant revenue from product sales to date and will continue to incur significant research and development and other expenses related to its ongoing operations. During the nine months ended September 30, 2018, the Company recorded a net loss of $102.0 million and used $73.1 million of cash for operating activities. As of September 30, 2018, the Company had a working capital surplus of $184.1 million and an accumulated deficit of $644.2 million. The Company has funded its operations primarily through the issuance and sale of common stock, convertible preferred stock, notes payable, and convertible notes. As of September 30, 2018, the Company had capital resources consisting of cash, cash equivalents, and investments of $208.4 million. The Company believes that its existing cash, cash equivalents and investments will allow the Company to fund its operating plan through at least the next 12 months following the issuance of this Form 10-Q and may identify additional capital resources to fund its operations. Basis of Presentation The accompanying unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, in the opinion of management, include all adjustments which the Company considers necessary for the fair statement of the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets at the date of the balance sheets and the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss and Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the interim periods covered. The Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet for the year ended December 31, 2017 was derived from audited financial statements, but does not include all disclosures required by generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America, or US GAAP. The interim results presented herein are not necessarily indicative of the results of operations that may be expected for the full fiscal year ending December 31, 2018, or any other future period. The Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements should be read in conjunction with the Company’s audited Consolidated Financial Statements contained in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017, which was filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC, on March 2, 2018. The Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements of the Company include the Company’s accounts and those of its wholly-owned subsidiaries, and have been prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, or US GAAP. The Company operates in one segment. Principles of Consolidation The Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements include the accounts of the company and its wholly-owned subsidiaries. All intercompany transactions have been eliminated. At-The-Market Offering In March 2016, the Company entered into an At-The-Market Issuance Sales Agreement, or the 2016 ATM Agreement, with Cowen and Company, LLC, or Cowen, under which the Company may offer and sell common stock having aggregate proceeds of up to $75.0 million from time to time through Cowen, the Company's sales agent. Sales of common stock through Cowen under the 2016 ATM agreement will be made by means of ordinary brokers’ transactions on the Nasdaq Global Market or otherwise at market prices prevailing at the time of sale, in block transactions, or as otherwise agreed upon by the Company and Cowen. Cowen will sell the common stock from time to time, based upon instructions from the Company. The Company agreed to pay Cowen a commission of up to 3.0% of the gross sales proceeds of any common stock sold through Cowen under the ATM Agreement. During the nine months ended September 30, 2017, the Company sold 1,802,651 shares of its common stock under the 2016 ATM Agreement at a weighted average price of $22.17 per share resulting in net proceeds of $38.2 million, which was comprised of gross proceeds after commissions of $38.8 million net of offering expenses of $0.6 million of which $0.2 million was paid in 2016 and $0.4 million was paid in 2017. In March 2018, the Company terminated the 2016 ATM Agreement and entered into a Controlled Equity Offering sales agreement, or the 2018 ATM Agreement, with Cantor Fitzgerald & Co., or Cantor Fitzgerald, under which the Company may offer and sell common stock having aggregate proceeds of up to $125.0 million from time to time through Cantor Fitzgerald as our sales agent. Sales of common stock through Cantor Fitzgerald under the 2018 ATM Agreement will be made by means of ordinary brokers’ transactions on the Nasdaq Global Market or otherwise at market prices prevailing at the time of sale, in block transactions, or as otherwise agreed upon by the Company and Cantor Fitzgerald. Cantor Fitzgerald will sell the common stock from time to time, based upon instructions from the Company. The Company agreed to pay Cantor Fitzgerald a commission of up to 3.0% of the gross sales proceeds of any common stock sold through Cantor Fitzgerald under the 2018 ATM Agreement. No sales of common stock have taken place under the 2018 ATM Agreement as of September 30, 2018.

Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2018

Accounting Policies [Abstract]

Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Significant accounting policies are described in Note 2 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 15 of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017. There have been no changes to the Company’s significant accounting policies during the nine months ended September 30, 2018, except as described below.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements in conformity with US GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements and accompanying notes. Such management estimates include revenue recognition, deferred revenue, accruals, stock-based compensation, the fair value of a derivative liability, and the valuation of deferred tax assets. The Company bases its estimates on historical experience and on assumptions that it believes are reasonable, however, actual results could differ significantly from those estimates.

Revenue

Effective January 1, 2018, the Company adopted Accounting Standards Codification Topic 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (ASC 606) using the full retrospective transition method. The Company evaluated its prior contractual revenue arrangement with Precision Dermatology, Inc., which was acquired by Valeant Pharmaceuticals International Inc., or Valeant, in 2014. After Valeant notified the Company that it intended to terminate the asset purchase and royalty agreement in 2015, the Company continued to receive royalties of $75,000 each quarter until November 2017 when the Company and Valeant entered into an Asset Transfer Agreement to finalize the termination of the asset purchase and royalty agreement and Valeant returned the Relastin® intellectual property rights to the Company. Based on its evaluation, the Company determined that the new guidance had no impact to the revenue recognized prior to January 1, 2018 and, accordingly, had no impact on the accumulated deficit as of January 1, 2018.

The Company elected to use certain practical expedients permitted for the adoption of ASC 606 (Note 3). The adoption had no impact on the Company’s financial position, results of operations or liquidity. This standard applies to all contracts with customers, except for contracts that are within the scope of other standards, such as leases, insurance, collaboration arrangements and financial instruments. Under ASC 606, the Company recognizes revenue when its customer obtains control of promised goods or services, in an amount that reflects the consideration which the Company expects to receive in exchange for those goods or services.

To determine revenue recognition for arrangements that the Company determines are within the scope of ASC 606, the Company performs the following five steps: (i) identify the contract(s) with a customer; (ii) identify the performance obligations in the contract; (iii) determine the transaction price; (iv) allocate the transaction price to the performance obligations in the contract; and (v) recognize revenue when (or as) the Company satisfies a performance obligation. The Company only applies the five-step model to contracts when it is probable that Company will collect the consideration it is entitled to in exchange for the goods or services it transfers to the customer. At contract inception, once the contract is determined to be within the scope of ASC 606, the Company assesses the goods or services promised within each contract and determines those that are performance obligations and assesses whether each promised good or service is distinct. The Company then recognizes as revenue the amount of the transaction price that is allocated to the respective performance obligation when (or as) the performance obligation is satisfied.

Licenses of intellectual property

If the license to the Company’s intellectual property is determined to be distinct from the other performance obligations identified in the arrangement, the Company recognizes revenue from non-refundable, up-front fees allocated to the license when the license is transferred to the customer and the customer is able to use and benefit from the license. For licenses that are determined to not represent distinct performance obligations, the Company utilizes judgment to assess the nature of the combined performance obligation to determine whether the combined performance obligation is satisfied over time or at a point in time and, if over time, the appropriate method of measuring proportional performance for purposes of recognizing revenue from non-refundable, up-front fees. The Company evaluates the measure of proportional performance each reporting period and, if necessary, adjusts the measure of performance and related revenue recognition.

Milestone payments

At the inception of each arrangement that includes development, regulatory or commercial milestone payments, the Company evaluates whether the milestones are considered probable of being reached and estimates the amount to be included in the transaction price. ASC 606 suggests two alternatives to use when estimating the amount of variable consideration: the expected value method and the most likely amount method. Under the expected value method, an entity considers the sum of probability-weighted amounts in a range of possible consideration amounts. Under the most likely amount method, an entity considers the single most likely amount in a range of possible consideration amounts. Whichever method is used should be consistently applied throughout the life of the contract; however, it is not necessary for the Company to use the same approach for all contracts. If it is probable that a significant revenue reversal would not occur, the associated milestone value is included in the transaction price. Milestone payments that are not within the control of the Company or the licensee, such as regulatory approvals, are not considered probable of being achieved until those approvals are received. The transaction price is then allocated to each performance obligation (as determined to be appropriate) on a relative stand-alone selling price basis. The Company recognizes revenue as or when the performance obligations under the contract are satisfied. At the end of each subsequent reporting period, the Company re-evaluates the probability or achievement of each such milestone and any related constraint, and if necessary, adjusts its estimates of the overall transaction price. Any such adjustments are recorded on a cumulative catch-up basis, which would affect revenues and earnings in the period of adjustment.

Royalties

For arrangements that include sales-based royalties, including milestone payments based on the level of sales, and the license is deemed to be the predominant item to which the royalties relate, the Company recognizes revenue at the later of (i) when the related sales occur, or (ii) when the performance obligation to which some or all of the royalty has been allocated has been satisfied (or partially satisfied). Up-front payments and fees are recorded as deferred revenue upon receipt or when due, and may require deferral of revenue recognition to a future period until the Company performs its obligations under these arrangements. Amounts payable to the Company are recorded as accounts receivable when the Company’s right to consideration is unconditional. As a practical expedient, the Company does not assess whether a contract has a significant financing component if the expectation at contract inception is such that the period between payment by the customer and the transfer of the promised goods or services to the customer will be one year or less.

Net Loss per Share Attributable to Common Stockholders

The Company’s basic net loss per share attributable to common stockholders is calculated by dividing the net loss by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding for the period, which includes vested restricted stock awards. The diluted net loss per share attributable to common stockholders is computed by giving effect to all potential dilutive common stock equivalents outstanding for the period. The diluted net loss per share attributable to common stockholders also includes vested restricted stock awards and, if the effect is not anti-dilutive, unvested restricted stock awards. For purposes of this calculation, options to purchase common stock, unvested restricted stock, and common stock warrants are considered common stock equivalents.

The following common stock equivalents were excluded from the computation of diluted net loss per share for the periods presented because including them would have been antidilutive:



	As of September 30.
	2018	2017
Outstanding common stock options	3,491,751	3,381,927
Outstanding common stock warrants	34,113	41,595
Unvested restricted stock awards	679,541	640,931
Shares expected to be purchased on December 31 under the 2014 ESPP	16,712	14,778

Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements

In June 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-07, Compensation - Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Improvements to Nonemployee Share-Based Payment Accounting, to expand the scope of Topic 718 to include share-based payment transactions for acquiring goods and services from non-employees. Under ASU 2018-07, equity-classified share-based payment awards to non-employees are measured at fair value on the grant date and the probability of satisfying performance conditions must be considered for equity-classified non-employee share-based payment awards with such conditions. ASU 2018-07 does not specify the period(s) or manner of expense recognition for share-based payment awards to non-employees other than to require that recognition occur in the same period(s) and in the same manner as if the grantor had paid cash for the goods or services. ASU 2018-07 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, with early adoption permitted. The Company early adopted ASU 2018-07 as of July 1, 2018, and remeasured all outstanding equity-classified non-employee share-based payment awards at fair value as of the adoption date, and also recognized a cumulative-effect increase to the Company's opening 2018 accumulated deficit balance of less than $0.1 million in connection with the adoption and remeasurement.

In March 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-05, Income Taxes (Topic 740) - Amendments to SEC Paragraphs Pursuant to SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 118. This standard amends Accounting Standards Codification 740, Income Taxes (ASC 740) to provide guidance on accounting for the tax effects of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the Tax Reform Act) pursuant to Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 118, which allows companies to complete the accounting under ASC 740 within a one-year measurement period from the Tax Act enactment date. This standard is effective upon issuance. The Company continues to assess the accounting impact resulting from the Tax Reform Act. The Company has substantially completed the accounting assessment with regard to the tax effects associated with an intra-entity transfer of certain intellectual property rights with the enactment of Tax Reform Act, this resulted in an increase in net operating loss of $39.6 million and increased the SAB 118 estimated impact from the Tax Reform Act by $5.2 million to deferred taxes. In all aspects, the Company will continue to make and refine calculations as additional analysis is completed. As of September 30, 2018, the Company performed additional analysis and estimated re-measurement of certain deferred taxes to be $68.1 million which continues to be fully offset by a valuation allowance. The Company has substantially completed its assessment, except for the impact related to deferred taxes, and expects to complete the accounting assessment during the one-year measurement period provided by SAB 118.

In May 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-09, Scope of Modification Accounting (Topic 718), which amends the scope of modification accounting for share-based payment arrangements. The amendment provides guidance about which changes to the terms or conditions of a share-based payment award require an entity to apply modification accounting. ASU 2017-09 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, with early adoption permitted. The adoption of this standard on January 1, 2018 did not impact the Company's Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

In October 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-16, Income Taxes - Intra-Entity Transfers of Assets Other Than Inventory, which requires entities to recognize income tax consequences of an intra-entity transfer of an asset other than inventory when the transfer occurs. The amendments in ASU 2016-16 are effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim reporting periods within those annual reporting periods and requires a modified retrospective method of adoption. As of January 1, 2018, the Company adopted ASU 2016-16 and determined this standard did not have a financial statement impact on the Company's Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements as the Company has a full valuation allowance.

In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers, which sets forth a single, comprehensive revenue recognition model for all contracts with customers to improve comparability. Subsequently, the FASB issued several standards related to ASU 2014-09 (collectively, the “New Revenue Standard”), including the most recent ASU, ASU 2017-14, Income Statement - Reporting Comprehensive Income (Topic 220), and Revenue Recognition (Topic 605), Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606), which was issued in November 2017. The New Revenue Standard requires revenue recognition to depict the transfer of goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration that the entity expects to receive in exchange for those goods or services. In addition, the New Revenue Standard requires expanded disclosures. This New Revenue Standard permits the use of either the retrospective or cumulative effect transition method when adopted. As of January 1, 2018, the Company adopted the New Revenue Standard on a retrospective basis and determined there was no material impact to the Company's Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-13, Fair Value Measurements (Topic 820): Disclosure Framework - Changes to the Disclosure Requirements for Fair Value Measurement. ASU 2018-13 modifies the disclosure requirements for fair value measurements in Topic 820 based on the objectives of the FASB Concepts Statement, Conceptual Framework for Financial Reporting - Chapter 8: Notes to Financial Statements which aims to improve the effectiveness of notes to financial statements while allowing for the appropriate exercise of discretion by reporting entities based on materiality. The main provisions of ASU 2018-13 include the removal or modification of certain non-essential disclosure requirements and the addition of new disclosure requirements for public companies related to the changes in unrealized gains and losses for the period included in other comprehensive income for recurring Level 3 fair value measurements held at the end of the reporting period, and the range and weighted average of significant unobservable inputs used to develop Level 3 fair value measurements. ASU 2018-13 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018 with early adoption permitted. The Company does not expect the adoption of the new standard to have a material impact on the Company's Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

In July 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-10, Leases (Topic 842), Codification Improvements and ASU 2018-11 Leases (Topic 842), Targeted Improvements, to provide additional guidance for the adoption of Topic 842. ASU 2018-10 clarifies certain provisions and correct unintended applications of the guidance such as the application of implicit rate, lessee reassessment of lease classification, and certain transition adjustments that should be recognized to earnings rather than to stockholders' equity. ASU 2018-11 provides an alternative transition method and practical expedient for separating contract components for the adoption of Topic 842. In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02 Leases (Topic 842) which requires an entity to recognize assets and liabilities arising from a lease for both financing and operating leases with terms greater than 12 months. ASU 2018-11, ASU 2018-10, and ASU 2016-02 (collectively, "the new lease standards") are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, with early adoption permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the effect the new lease standards will have on its Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements; however, the Company anticipates recognizing assets and liabilities arising from any leases that meet the requirements under the new lease standards on the adoption date and including qualitative and quantitative disclosures in the Company’s Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

In July 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-09, Codification Improvements. The amendments in ASU 2018-09 affect a wide variety of Topics in the FASB Codification and apply to all reporting entities within the scope of the affected accounting guidance. The Company has evaluated ASU 2018-09 in its entirety and determined that the amendments related to Topic 718-740, Compensation-Stock Compensation-Income Taxes, are the only provisions that currently apply to the Company. The amendments in ASU 2018-09 related to Topic 718-740, Compensation-Stock Compensation-Income Taxes, clarify that an entity should recognize excess tax benefits related to stock compensation transactions in the period in which the amount of the deduction is determined. The amendments in ASU 2018-09 related to Topic 718-740 are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, with early adoption permitted. The Company does not expect the adoption of the new standard to have a material impact on the Company's Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

In February 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-02, Income Statement - Reporting Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Reclassification of Certain Tax Effects from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income, to address specific consequences of the Tax Reform Act. The update allows a reclassification from accumulated other comprehensive income to retained earnings for stranded tax effects resulting from the Tax Reform Act. ASU 2018-02 is effective January 1, 2019, with early adoption permitted, and is to be applied either in the period of adoption or retrospectively to each period in which the effect of the change in the U.S. federal corporate income tax rate in the Tax Reform Act is recognized. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of the new standard on the Company's Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

Collaboration and License Revenue	9 Months Ended
Collaboration and License Revenue	Sep. 30, 2018
Organization, Consolidation and Presentation of Financial Statements [Abstract]
Collaboration and License Revenue	Collaboration and License Revenue Agreement Terms On February 28, 2018, the Company and Mylan Ireland Limited, or Mylan, a wholly-owned indirect subsidiary of Mylan N.V., entered into a collaboration agreement or the Mylan Collaboration, pursuant to which the Company and Mylan will collaborate exclusively, on a world-wide basis (excluding Japan), to develop, manufacture, and commercialize a biosimilar to the branded biologic product (onabotulinumtoxinA) marketed as BOTOX®. Under the Mylan Collaboration, the Company is responsible for conducting initial non-clinical development activities with the goal of preparing for and conducting a scientific advice meeting with the FDA to receive feedback as to whether a biosimilar biological pathway is feasible for BOTOX®. The Company is solely responsible for these initial activities and the related costs. Upon completion of the initial activities, Mylan may decide whether to continue the development of the biosimilar. If the development is continued, the Company will be primarily responsible for (a) non-clinical development activities, (b) clinical development activities in North America, and (c) manufacturing and supply of clinical drug substance and drug product; and Mylan will be primarily responsible for (a) clinical development activities outside of North America (excluding Japan) (the “ex-U.S. Mylan territories”), (b) regulatory activities, and (c) commercialization for any approved product. The Company will be solely responsible for an initial portion of non-clinical development costs. The remaining portion of any non-clinical development costs and clinical development costs for obtaining approval in the U.S. and Europe will be shared equally between the parties, and Mylan will be responsible for all other clinical development costs and commercialization expenses. The Company and Mylan will form a joint steering committee, consisting of an equal number of members from the Company and Mylan, to oversee and manage the development, manufacture and commercialization of the biosimilar. The parties will also enter into a separate agreement, within six months, covering supply of drug substance and drug product. In addition, Mylan may elect to have the drug product manufactured by another party, including a third-party contract manufacturing organization or a Mylan affiliate; however, Mylan may not manufacture or have manufactured the drug substance, rights to which are retained by the Company. Under the Mylan Collaboration, the Company granted Mylan an exclusive, world-wide license (excluding Japan) to the Company’s intellectual property rights for the development and commercialization of the biosimilar. The Company retained all rights in Japan and has retained rights in the U.S. and ex-U.S. Mylan territories to develop and manufacture the biosimilar for Mylan to commercialize. Mylan paid the Company a non-refundable upfront payment of $25 million with contingent payments of up to $100 million in the aggregate, upon the achievement of specified clinical and regulatory (i.e. biosimilar biological pathway) milestones and of specified, tiered sales milestones of up to $225 million. The upfront payment does not represent a financing component for the transfer of goods or services. The contingent payments would be payable following Mylan's decision to continue development services for Initial Phase and Phase 3 clinical trials and upon meeting certain milestones. In addition, Mylan would pay the Company low to mid-double digit royalties on any sales of the biosimilar in the U.S., mid-double digit royalties on any sales in Europe, and high single digit royalties on any sales in other ex-U.S. Mylan territories. However, the Company agreed to waive royalties for U.S. sales, up to a limit of $50 million in annual sales, during the first approximately four years after commercialization to defray launch costs. The term of the collaboration will continue, on a country-by-country basis, in perpetuity until terminated by either party pursuant to the terms of the Mylan Collaboration. Either party may terminate the agreement for breach by, or bankruptcy of, the other party. Mylan may terminate the Mylan Collaboration if a biosimilar development pathway is not deemed viable, with such determination only occurring after an advisory meeting with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, or FDA. Further, Mylan may terminate the Collaboration in its entirety or on a region-by-region basis. All rights, including licenses, and obligations terminate in the country or countries for which termination applies, with limited exceptions for royalty-bearing licenses to certain intellectual property rights, and rights to certain data, for the continued development and sale of the biosimilar in the country or countries for which termination applies. Revenue Recognition The Company identified the following material promises within the Agreement: (1) intellectual property license, or IP license, for technology and know-how related to the biosimilar, (2) the performance of initial development services for the biosimilar prior to the FDA advisory meeting, (3) the performance of development services, during the Initial Phase and Phase 3 clinical trials for the biosimilar through the filing of an Investigational New Drug, or IND, application by the Company, and (4) manufacturing services to provide drug substance or drug product during the initial development, development, and commercialization periods. The Company considered that the license has standalone functionality and is capable of being distinct. However, the Company determined that the license is not distinct from the development and manufacturing services within the context of the agreement because the development and manufacturing services significantly increase the utility of the intellectual property. Specifically, the Company’s development, manufacturing and commercialization license can only provide benefit to Mylan in combination with the Company’s development services during initial development, the Initial Phase study, and the Phase 3 study. The IP related to the biosimilar platform, which is proprietary to the Company, is the foundation for the development activities related to the treatment for all indications. The manufacturing services are a necessary and integral part of the development services as they could only be conducted utilizing the outcomes of these services. Given the development services under the Mylan Collaboration are expected to involve significant further development of the initial IP, the Company has concluded that the development and compound supply services are not distinct from the license, and thus the license, development services and compound supply services are combined into a single performance obligation. The nature of the combined performance obligation is to provide development and manufacturing services to Mylan under the arrangement. The Company, following an evaluation, determined that Mylan’s option to decide whether to continue the development after the FDA feedback is received represents a material right, because it includes consideration for the IP license, and provides economic value for the duration of the entire development period, defined as the initial development through regulatory approval. Further, in accordance with ASC 606, the Company elected to use a practical alternative to estimating the standalone fair value selling price of the material right, which is based on the cost of expected services to be provided for the duration of the contract. In accordance with ASC 606, transaction price is defined as the amount of consideration to which an entity expects to be entitled in exchange for promised goods or services to a customer. The Company estimated the transaction price for the Mylan Collaboration using the most likely amount method. In order to determine the transaction price, the Company evaluated all of the payments to be received during the duration of the contract, which included milestones and consideration payable by Mylan. Other than the upfront payment, all other milestones and consideration the Company may earn under the Mylan agreement are subject to uncertainties related to development achievements, Mylan’s rights to terminate the agreement, and estimated effort for cost-sharing payments. Components of such estimated effort for cost-sharing payments include both internal and external costs. Consequently, the transaction price does not include any milestones and considerations that, if included, could result in a probable significant reversal of revenue when related uncertainties become resolved. Sales-based milestones and royalties reflect consideration for the value of the IP license, which is predominant in our agreement with Mylan. These milestones are not included in the transaction price until the subsequent sales occur. The initial estimated transaction price of $81 million included the $25 million upfront payment, $40 million of development milestones, and estimated variable consideration for cost-sharing payments from Mylan. The Company re-evaluates the transaction price in each reporting period and upon a change in circumstances, and during the three months ended September 30, 2018, there were no changes to the estimated transaction price. As of September 30, 2018, the transaction price allocated to undelivered performance obligations is $78.6 million. The Company estimates revenue recognized and deferred revenue based on the estimated cost of services incurred over the estimated cost of services to be provided for the development period. The development period is estimated to extend through 2022. However, it is possible that this period will change and is assessed at each reporting date. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2018, the Company recognized revenue related to development services rendered of $2.4 million and $3.2 million, respectively. As of September 30, 2018, the Company estimated short-term and long-term deferred revenue of $8.7 million and $13.0 million, respectively. The Company estimates that, if the option is exercised, long-term deferred revenue will be recognized over the completion of the Initial Phase and Phase 3 study development period. Nonetheless, it is reasonably possible that our estimated cost of total services to be provided could change.

Fair Value Measurements

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2018

Fair Value Disclosures [Abstract]

Fair Value Measurements

The Company determines the fair value of certain financial assets and liabilities using three levels of inputs as follows:


•	Level 1 — Observable inputs, such as quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities;


•	Level 2 — Observable inputs other than Level 1 prices, such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities, or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities; and


•	Level 3 — Valuations based on unobservable inputs to the valuation methodology and including data about assumptions market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability based on the best information available under the circumstances.

The carrying values of cash, prepaid expenses and other current assets, accounts payable, and accruals and other current liabilities approximate fair value due to the short maturities of these instruments.

The Company measures and reports certain financial instruments as assets and liabilities at fair value on a recurring basis. The fair value of these instruments was as follows (in thousands):



	As of September 30, 2018
	Fair Value		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
Assets
Money market funds	$	37,573	$	37,573	$	—	$	—
U.S. treasury securities	100,158		100,158		—		—
U.S. government agency obligations	63,102		—		63,102		—
Total assets measured at fair value	$	200,833	$	137,731	$	63,102	$	—

Liabilities
Derivative liability associated with Medicis settlement	$	2,763	$	—	$	—	$	2,763
Total liabilities measured at fair value	$	2,763	$	—	$	—	$	2,763



	As of December 31, 2017
	Fair Value		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
Assets
Money market funds	$	236,744	$	236,744	$	—	$	—
Total assets measured at fair value	$	236,744	$	236,744	$	—	$	—

Liabilities
Derivative liability associated with Medicis settlement	$	2,613	$	—	$	—	$	2,613
Total liabilities measured at fair value	$	2,613	$	—	$	—	$	2,613

The fair value of the U.S. government agency obligations is estimated by taking into consideration valuations obtained from third-party pricing services. The pricing services utilize industry standard valuation models, including both income and market-based approaches, for which all significant inputs are observable, either directly or indirectly, to estimate fair value. These inputs include reported trades of and broker/dealer quotes on the same or similar securities, issuer credit spreads, benchmark securities, prepayment/default projections based on historical data, and other observable inputs. Changes in the ability to observe valuation inputs may result in a reclassification of levels of certain securities within the fair value hierarchy. The Company did not transfer any assets or liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis between Level 1 and Level 2 during the nine months ended September 30, 2018 and the year ended December 31, 2017.

The following table sets forth a summary of the changes in the fair value of the Company’s Level 3 financial instruments as follows (in thousands):



	Derivative Liability Associated with Medicis Settlement
Fair value as of December 31, 2017	$	2,613
Change in fair value	150
Fair value as of September 30, 2018	$	2,763

The fair value of the derivative liability resulting from the Medicis litigation settlement was determined by estimating the timing and probability of the related regulatory approval and multiplying the payment amount by this probability percentage and a discount factor based primarily on the estimated timing of the payment and a credit risk adjustment (Note 4). Generally, increases or decreases in these unobservable inputs would result in a directionally similar impact to the fair value measurement of this derivative instrument. The significant unobservable inputs used in the fair value measurement of the Product Approval Payment derivative are the expected timing and probability of the payments at the valuation date and the credit risk adjustment.

- Definition

The entire disclosure for the fair value of financial instruments (as defined), including financial assets and financial liabilities (collectively, as defined), and the measurements of those instruments as well as disclosures related to the fair value of non-financial assets and liabilities. Such disclosures about the financial instruments, assets, and liabilities would include: (1) the fair value of the required items together with their carrying amounts (as appropriate); (2) for items for which it is not practicable to estimate fair value, disclosure would include: (a) information pertinent to estimating fair value (including, carrying amount, effective interest rate, and maturity, and (b) the reasons why it is not practicable to estimate fair value; (3) significant concentrations of credit risk including: (a) information about the activity, region, or economic characteristics identifying a concentration, (b) the maximum amount of loss the entity is exposed to based on the gross fair value of the related item, (c) policy for requiring collateral or other security and information as to accessing such collateral or security, and (d) the nature and brief description of such collateral or security; (4) quantitative information about market risks and how such risks are managed; (5) for items measured on both a recurring and nonrecurring basis information regarding the inputs used to develop the fair value measurement; and (6) for items presented in the financial statement for which fair value measurement is elected: (a) information necessary to understand the reasons for the election, (b) discussion of the effect of fair value changes on earnings, (c) a description of [similar groups] items for which the election is made and the relation thereof to the balance sheet, the aggregate carrying value of items included in the balance sheet that are not eligible for the election; (7) all other required (as defined) and desired information.

+ References + Details

Commitments and Contingencies

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2018

Commitments and Contingencies Disclosure [Abstract]

Commitments and Contingencies

Facility Lease

In January 2010, the Company entered into a non-cancelable facility lease (the "Lease") that requires monthly payments through January 2022. This facility is used for research, manufacturing, and administrative functions.

In February 2014, the Company extended the term of the Lease by thirty-six (36) months to January 2025. In May 2018, the Company further extended the term of the Lease for its existing facility by twenty-four (24) months to January 2027 and amended the lease to expand the existing premises by approximately nineteen thousand square feet, commencing on January 1, 2019. Under the terms of the amended lease agreements, the payments escalate over the term of the lease with the exception of a decrease in payments at the beginning of 2022. The Company recognizes the expense on a straight-line basis over the life of the existing lease. Rent expense was $1.4 million and $1.3 million for the three months ended September 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively, and $4.1 million and $4.0 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively.

In November 2017, the Company entered into a non-cancelable equipment operating lease that requires sixty (60) equal monthly payments through October 2022. Lease payments total $0.2 million during the entire lease term.

As of September 30, 2018, the aggregate total future minimum lease payments under non-cancelable operating leases were as follows (in thousands):



Year Ending December 31,
2018	$	1,409
2019	6,399
2020	6,722
2021	6,920
2022 and thereafter	28,936
Total payments	$	50,386

Other Milestone-Based Commitments

The Company has one remaining future milestone payment to List Laboratories of $2.0 million due and payable on the achievement of a certain regulatory milestone. The Company is also obligated to pay royalties to List Laboratories on future sales of botulinum toxin products.

In June 2016, the Company entered into an asset purchase agreement with Botulinum Toxin Research Associates, Inc., or BTRX (the "BTRX Purchase Agreement"). Under the BTRX Purchase Agreement, the Company acquired all rights, title and interest in a portfolio of botulinum toxin-related patents and patent applications from BTRX and was granted the right of first negotiation and first refusal with respect to other botulinum toxin-related patents owned or controlled by BTRX. In exchange, the Company agreed to an upfront expenditure of $2.0 million of which $1.8 million was paid immediately, $0.1 million was paid in June 2017, and the remaining $0.1 million was paid in May 2018. The Company also has obligations to pay Botulinum Toxin Research Associates, Inc. (BTRX) up to $16.0 million upon the satisfaction of specified milestones relating to the Company’s product revenue, intellectual property, and clinical and regulatory events. As of September 30, 2018, a one-time intellectual property development milestone liability of $1.0 million has been recorded and included in accruals and other current liabilities.

In April 2016, the Company entered into an agreement with BioSentinel, Inc. to in-license their technology and expertise for research and development and manufacturing purposes. In addition to minimum quarterly use fees, the Company has a one-time future milestone payment of $0.3 million payable to BioSentinel, Inc. upon the achievement of regulatory approval.

Purchase Commitments

On March 14, 2017, the Company entered into a Technology Transfer, Validation and Commercial Fill/Finish Services Agreement (the “Services Agreement”) and Statement of Work ("SoW") with Ajinomoto Althea, Inc., a contract development and manufacturing organization (“Althea”). Under the Services Agreement, Althea has agreed, among other things, to provide the Company with a future source of commercial fill/finish services for the Company’s neuromodulator products. The Services Agreement has an initial term that will expire in 2024, unless terminated sooner by either party. In accordance with the Services Agreement, the Company will have minimum purchase obligations based on its production forecasts. Since inception of the Services Agreement through September 30, 2018, the Company has made non-refundable advanced payments of $1.9 million in accordance with the terms of this arrangement. The advanced payments are amortized and recorded to expenses over the period the services are rendered by Althea. The remaining services are cancellable at any time, with the Company required to pay costs incurred through the cancellation date.

Contingencies

From time to time, the Company may have certain contingent liabilities that arise in the ordinary course of business activities. The Company accrues a liability for such matters when it is probable that future expenditures will be made and such expenditures can be reasonably estimated. The Company expects that contingencies related to regulatory approval milestones will only become probable once such regulatory outcome is achieved. The Company is not subject to any known current pending legal matters or claims that would have a material adverse effect on its financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

Indemnification

The Company enters into standard indemnification agreements in the ordinary course of business. Pursuant to these arrangements, the Company indemnifies, holds harmless, and agrees to reimburse the indemnified parties for losses suffered or incurred by the indemnified party, in connection with any trade secret, copyright, patent or other intellectual property infringement claim by any third party with respect to its technology. The term of these indemnification agreements is generally perpetual after the execution of the agreement. The maximum potential amount of future payments the Company could be required to make under these agreements is not determinable because it involves claims that may be made against the Company in the future, but have not yet been made. The Company has not incurred costs to defend lawsuits or settle claims related to these indemnification agreements.

The Company has entered into indemnification agreements with its directors and officers that may require the Company to indemnify them against liabilities that may arise by reason of their status or service as directors or officers, other than liabilities arising from willful misconduct of the individual.

No amounts associated with such indemnifications have been recorded during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2018.

Stockholders' Equity

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2018

Equity [Abstract]

Stockholders' Equity

Convertible Preferred Stock

As of September 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, the Company had 5,000,000 shares of convertible preferred stock authorized with a par value of $0.001 per share and no preferred stock issued and outstanding.

Warrants

As of September 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, the Company had outstanding warrants to purchase 34,113 shares of common stock at an exercise price per share of $14.95 and which expire in 2020.

Stock Option Plan

2014 Equity Incentive Plan and 2014 Inducement Plan

On January 1, 2018, the number of shares of common stock reserved for issuance under the Company’s 2014 Equity Incentive Plan, or 2014 EIP, automatically increased by 4% of the total number of shares of the Company’s common stock outstanding on December 31, 2017, or 1,460,643 shares. During the nine months ended September 30, 2018, the Company granted stock options for 826,450 shares of common stock and 299,400 restricted stock awards under the 2014 EIP. As of September 30, 2018, there were 1,749,448 shares available for issuance under the 2014 EIP.

During the nine months ended September 30, 2018, there were 110,000 stock options and 16,000 restricted stock awards granted under the 2014 Inducement Plan (the "2014 IN"). As of September 30, 2018, there were 167,737 shares available for issuance under the 2014 IN.

The grant-date fair value of the employee stock options under the 2014 EIP and 2014 IN was estimated using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following weighted-average assumptions:



	Three Months Ended September 30,				Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2018		2017		2018		2017
Expected term (in years)	6.1		6.0		6.0		6.0
Expected volatility	59.0	%	66.6	%	60.5	%	67.8	%
Risk-free interest rate	2.8	%	2.0	%	2.7	%	2.1	%
Expected dividend rate	—	%	—	%	—	%	—	%

Fair Value of Common Stock. The fair value of the shares of common stock is based on the Company's stock price as quoted by the Nasdaq Global Market.

Expected Term. The expected term for employees, non-employee directors, and non-employee consultants is based on the simplified method, as the Company’s stock options have the following characteristics: (i) granted at-the-money; (ii) exercisability is conditioned upon service through the vesting date; (iii) termination of service prior to vesting results in forfeiture; (iv) limited exercise period following termination of service; and (v) options are non-transferable and non-hedgeable, or “plain vanilla” options, and the Company has a limited history of exercise data. Prior to the adoption of ASU 2018-07 on July 1, 2018 (Note 2), the expected term for non-employee consultants was based on the remaining contractual term.

Expected Volatility. The expected volatility is based on the historical volatility of a group of similar entities combined with the historical volatility of the Company. In evaluating similarity, the Company considered factors such as industry, stage of life cycle, capital structure, and size.

Risk-Free Interest Rate. The risk-free interest rate is based on U.S. Treasury constant maturity rates with remaining terms similar to the expected term of the options.

Expected Dividend Rate. The Company has not and does not plan to pay dividends in the foreseeable future, and therefore used an expected dividend rate of zero percent in the valuation model.

Forfeitures. The Company accounts for forfeitures as they occur.

During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2018, the Company issued and had outstanding options and awards for non-employee consultants which have continued to vest in accordance with the 2014 EIP. During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017, there were outstanding options and awards issued to non-employee consultants which have continued to vest in accordance with the 2014 EIP.

The fair value of the stock options outstanding for non-employee consultants is calculated in accordance with the provisions of ASU 2018-07 (Note 2) for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2018, and the provisions of ASC 505-50 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017, using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following weighted-average assumptions:



	Three Months Ended September 30,				Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2018		2017		2018		2017
Expected term (in years)	5.5		8.9		5.5		8.9
Expected volatility	59.4	%	68.1	%	59.4	%	68.6	%
Risk-free interest rate	2.8	%	2.2	%	2.8	%	2.2	%
Expected dividend rate	—	%	—	%	—	%	—	%

2014 Employee Stock Purchase Plan

On January 1, 2018, the number of shares of common stock reserved for issuance under the Company’s 2014 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, or 2014 ESPP, automatically increased by the maximum of 300,000 shares. As of September 30, 2018, there were 1,198,039 shares available for issuance under the 2014 ESPP.

The fair value of the option component of the shares purchased under the 2014 ESPP was estimated using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following weighted-average assumptions:



	Three Months Ended September 30,				Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2018		2017		2018		2017
Expected term (in years)	0.5		0.5		0.5		0.5
Expected volatility	42.2	%	46.6	%	50.2	%	59.1	%
Risk-free interest rate	2.4	%	1.1	%	2.0	%	0.9	%
Expected dividend rate	—	%	—	%	—	%	—	%

Fair Value of Common Stock. The fair value of the shares of common stock is based on the Company’s stock price.

Expected Term. The expected term is based on the term of the purchase period under the 2014 ESPP.

Expected Volatility. The expected volatility is based on the historical volatility of the Company's common stock.

Risk-Free Interest Rate. The risk-free interest rate is based on U.S. Treasury constant maturity rates with remaining terms similar to the expected term.

Expected Dividend Rate. The Company has never paid dividends and does not plan to pay dividends in the foreseeable future, and therefore used an expected dividend rate of zero percent in the valuation model.

Total Stock-Based Compensation

Total stock-based compensation expense related to options, restricted stock awards, and ESPP for employees, non-employee directors, and non-employee consultants was allocated as follows (in thousands):



	Three Months Ended September 30,				Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2018		2017		2018		2017
Research and development	$	1,836	$	1,534	$	5,627	$	4,341
General and administrative	2,256		1,612		6,795		5,479
Total stock-based compensation expense	$	4,092	$	3,146	$	12,422	$	9,820

Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Policies)	9 Months Ended
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Policies)	Sep. 30, 2018
Accounting Policies [Abstract]
Use of Estimates	Use of Estimates The preparation of Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements in conformity with US GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements and accompanying notes. Such management estimates include revenue recognition, deferred revenue, accruals, stock-based compensation, the fair value of a derivative liability, and the valuation of deferred tax assets. The Company bases its estimates on historical experience and on assumptions that it believes are reasonable, however, actual results could differ significantly from those estimates.
Revenue	Revenue Effective January 1, 2018, the Company adopted Accounting Standards Codification Topic 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (ASC 606) using the full retrospective transition method. The Company evaluated its prior contractual revenue arrangement with Precision Dermatology, Inc., which was acquired by Valeant Pharmaceuticals International Inc., or Valeant, in 2014. After Valeant notified the Company that it intended to terminate the asset purchase and royalty agreement in 2015, the Company continued to receive royalties of $75,000 each quarter until November 2017 when the Company and Valeant entered into an Asset Transfer Agreement to finalize the termination of the asset purchase and royalty agreement and Valeant returned the Relastin® intellectual property rights to the Company. Based on its evaluation, the Company determined that the new guidance had no impact to the revenue recognized prior to January 1, 2018 and, accordingly, had no impact on the accumulated deficit as of January 1, 2018. The Company elected to use certain practical expedients permitted for the adoption of ASC 606 (Note 3). The adoption had no impact on the Company’s financial position, results of operations or liquidity. This standard applies to all contracts with customers, except for contracts that are within the scope of other standards, such as leases, insurance, collaboration arrangements and financial instruments. Under ASC 606, the Company recognizes revenue when its customer obtains control of promised goods or services, in an amount that reflects the consideration which the Company expects to receive in exchange for those goods or services. To determine revenue recognition for arrangements that the Company determines are within the scope of ASC 606, the Company performs the following five steps: (i) identify the contract(s) with a customer; (ii) identify the performance obligations in the contract; (iii) determine the transaction price; (iv) allocate the transaction price to the performance obligations in the contract; and (v) recognize revenue when (or as) the Company satisfies a performance obligation. The Company only applies the five-step model to contracts when it is probable that Company will collect the consideration it is entitled to in exchange for the goods or services it transfers to the customer. At contract inception, once the contract is determined to be within the scope of ASC 606, the Company assesses the goods or services promised within each contract and determines those that are performance obligations and assesses whether each promised good or service is distinct. The Company then recognizes as revenue the amount of the transaction price that is allocated to the respective performance obligation when (or as) the performance obligation is satisfied. Licenses of intellectual property If the license to the Company’s intellectual property is determined to be distinct from the other performance obligations identified in the arrangement, the Company recognizes revenue from non-refundable, up-front fees allocated to the license when the license is transferred to the customer and the customer is able to use and benefit from the license. For licenses that are determined to not represent distinct performance obligations, the Company utilizes judgment to assess the nature of the combined performance obligation to determine whether the combined performance obligation is satisfied over time or at a point in time and, if over time, the appropriate method of measuring proportional performance for purposes of recognizing revenue from non-refundable, up-front fees. The Company evaluates the measure of proportional performance each reporting period and, if necessary, adjusts the measure of performance and related revenue recognition. Milestone payments At the inception of each arrangement that includes development, regulatory or commercial milestone payments, the Company evaluates whether the milestones are considered probable of being reached and estimates the amount to be included in the transaction price. ASC 606 suggests two alternatives to use when estimating the amount of variable consideration: the expected value method and the most likely amount method. Under the expected value method, an entity considers the sum of probability-weighted amounts in a range of possible consideration amounts. Under the most likely amount method, an entity considers the single most likely amount in a range of possible consideration amounts. Whichever method is used should be consistently applied throughout the life of the contract; however, it is not necessary for the Company to use the same approach for all contracts. If it is probable that a significant revenue reversal would not occur, the associated milestone value is included in the transaction price. Milestone payments that are not within the control of the Company or the licensee, such as regulatory approvals, are not considered probable of being achieved until those approvals are received. The transaction price is then allocated to each performance obligation (as determined to be appropriate) on a relative stand-alone selling price basis. The Company recognizes revenue as or when the performance obligations under the contract are satisfied. At the end of each subsequent reporting period, the Company re-evaluates the probability or achievement of each such milestone and any related constraint, and if necessary, adjusts its estimates of the overall transaction price. Any such adjustments are recorded on a cumulative catch-up basis, which would affect revenues and earnings in the period of adjustment. Royalties For arrangements that include sales-based royalties, including milestone payments based on the level of sales, and the license is deemed to be the predominant item to which the royalties relate, the Company recognizes revenue at the later of (i) when the related sales occur, or (ii) when the performance obligation to which some or all of the royalty has been allocated has been satisfied (or partially satisfied). Up-front payments and fees are recorded as deferred revenue upon receipt or when due, and may require deferral of revenue recognition to a future period until the Company performs its obligations under these arrangements. Amounts payable to the Company are recorded as accounts receivable when the Company’s right to consideration is unconditional. As a practical expedient, the Company does not assess whether a contract has a significant financing component if the expectation at contract inception is such that the period between payment by the customer and the transfer of the promised goods or services to the customer will be one year or less.
Net Loss per Share Attributable to Common Stockholders	Net Loss per Share Attributable to Common Stockholders The Company’s basic net loss per share attributable to common stockholders is calculated by dividing the net loss by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding for the period, which includes vested restricted stock awards. The diluted net loss per share attributable to common stockholders is computed by giving effect to all potential dilutive common stock equivalents outstanding for the period. The diluted net loss per share attributable to common stockholders also includes vested restricted stock awards and, if the effect is not anti-dilutive, unvested restricted stock awards. For purposes of this calculation, options to purchase common stock, unvested restricted stock, and common stock warrants are considered common stock equivalents.
Accounting Pronouncements	Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements In June 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-07, Compensation - Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Improvements to Nonemployee Share-Based Payment Accounting, to expand the scope of Topic 718 to include share-based payment transactions for acquiring goods and services from non-employees. Under ASU 2018-07, equity-classified share-based payment awards to non-employees are measured at fair value on the grant date and the probability of satisfying performance conditions must be considered for equity-classified non-employee share-based payment awards with such conditions. ASU 2018-07 does not specify the period(s) or manner of expense recognition for share-based payment awards to non-employees other than to require that recognition occur in the same period(s) and in the same manner as if the grantor had paid cash for the goods or services. ASU 2018-07 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, with early adoption permitted. The Company early adopted ASU 2018-07 as of July 1, 2018, and remeasured all outstanding equity-classified non-employee share-based payment awards at fair value as of the adoption date, and also recognized a cumulative-effect increase to the Company's opening 2018 accumulated deficit balance of less than $0.1 million in connection with the adoption and remeasurement. In March 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-05, Income Taxes (Topic 740) - Amendments to SEC Paragraphs Pursuant to SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 118. This standard amends Accounting Standards Codification 740, Income Taxes (ASC 740) to provide guidance on accounting for the tax effects of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the Tax Reform Act) pursuant to Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 118, which allows companies to complete the accounting under ASC 740 within a one-year measurement period from the Tax Act enactment date. This standard is effective upon issuance. The Company continues to assess the accounting impact resulting from the Tax Reform Act. The Company has substantially completed the accounting assessment with regard to the tax effects associated with an intra-entity transfer of certain intellectual property rights with the enactment of Tax Reform Act, this resulted in an increase in net operating loss of $39.6 million and increased the SAB 118 estimated impact from the Tax Reform Act by $5.2 million to deferred taxes. In all aspects, the Company will continue to make and refine calculations as additional analysis is completed. As of September 30, 2018, the Company performed additional analysis and estimated re-measurement of certain deferred taxes to be $68.1 million which continues to be fully offset by a valuation allowance. The Company has substantially completed its assessment, except for the impact related to deferred taxes, and expects to complete the accounting assessment during the one-year measurement period provided by SAB 118. In May 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-09, Scope of Modification Accounting (Topic 718), which amends the scope of modification accounting for share-based payment arrangements. The amendment provides guidance about which changes to the terms or conditions of a share-based payment award require an entity to apply modification accounting. ASU 2017-09 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, with early adoption permitted. The adoption of this standard on January 1, 2018 did not impact the Company's Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements. In October 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-16, Income Taxes - Intra-Entity Transfers of Assets Other Than Inventory, which requires entities to recognize income tax consequences of an intra-entity transfer of an asset other than inventory when the transfer occurs. The amendments in ASU 2016-16 are effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim reporting periods within those annual reporting periods and requires a modified retrospective method of adoption. As of January 1, 2018, the Company adopted ASU 2016-16 and determined this standard did not have a financial statement impact on the Company's Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements as the Company has a full valuation allowance. In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers, which sets forth a single, comprehensive revenue recognition model for all contracts with customers to improve comparability. Subsequently, the FASB issued several standards related to ASU 2014-09 (collectively, the “New Revenue Standard”), including the most recent ASU, ASU 2017-14, Income Statement - Reporting Comprehensive Income (Topic 220), and Revenue Recognition (Topic 605), Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606), which was issued in November 2017. The New Revenue Standard requires revenue recognition to depict the transfer of goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration that the entity expects to receive in exchange for those goods or services. In addition, the New Revenue Standard requires expanded disclosures. This New Revenue Standard permits the use of either the retrospective or cumulative effect transition method when adopted. As of January 1, 2018, the Company adopted the New Revenue Standard on a retrospective basis and determined there was no material impact to the Company's Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements. Recent Accounting Pronouncements In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-13, Fair Value Measurements (Topic 820): Disclosure Framework - Changes to the Disclosure Requirements for Fair Value Measurement. ASU 2018-13 modifies the disclosure requirements for fair value measurements in Topic 820 based on the objectives of the FASB Concepts Statement, Conceptual Framework for Financial Reporting - Chapter 8: Notes to Financial Statements which aims to improve the effectiveness of notes to financial statements while allowing for the appropriate exercise of discretion by reporting entities based on materiality. The main provisions of ASU 2018-13 include the removal or modification of certain non-essential disclosure requirements and the addition of new disclosure requirements for public companies related to the changes in unrealized gains and losses for the period included in other comprehensive income for recurring Level 3 fair value measurements held at the end of the reporting period, and the range and weighted average of significant unobservable inputs used to develop Level 3 fair value measurements. ASU 2018-13 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018 with early adoption permitted. The Company does not expect the adoption of the new standard to have a material impact on the Company's Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements. In July 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-10, Leases (Topic 842), Codification Improvements and ASU 2018-11 Leases (Topic 842), Targeted Improvements, to provide additional guidance for the adoption of Topic 842. ASU 2018-10 clarifies certain provisions and correct unintended applications of the guidance such as the application of implicit rate, lessee reassessment of lease classification, and certain transition adjustments that should be recognized to earnings rather than to stockholders' equity. ASU 2018-11 provides an alternative transition method and practical expedient for separating contract components for the adoption of Topic 842. In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02 Leases (Topic 842) which requires an entity to recognize assets and liabilities arising from a lease for both financing and operating leases with terms greater than 12 months. ASU 2018-11, ASU 2018-10, and ASU 2016-02 (collectively, "the new lease standards") are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, with early adoption permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the effect the new lease standards will have on its Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements; however, the Company anticipates recognizing assets and liabilities arising from any leases that meet the requirements under the new lease standards on the adoption date and including qualitative and quantitative disclosures in the Company’s Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements. In July 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-09, Codification Improvements. The amendments in ASU 2018-09 affect a wide variety of Topics in the FASB Codification and apply to all reporting entities within the scope of the affected accounting guidance. The Company has evaluated ASU 2018-09 in its entirety and determined that the amendments related to Topic 718-740, Compensation-Stock Compensation-Income Taxes, are the only provisions that currently apply to the Company. The amendments in ASU 2018-09 related to Topic 718-740, Compensation-Stock Compensation-Income Taxes, clarify that an entity should recognize excess tax benefits related to stock compensation transactions in the period in which the amount of the deduction is determined. The amendments in ASU 2018-09 related to Topic 718-740 are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, with early adoption permitted. The Company does not expect the adoption of the new standard to have a material impact on the Company's Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements. In February 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-02, Income Statement - Reporting Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Reclassification of Certain Tax Effects from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income, to address specific consequences of the Tax Reform Act. The update allows a reclassification from accumulated other comprehensive income to retained earnings for stranded tax effects resulting from the Tax Reform Act. ASU 2018-02 is effective January 1, 2019, with early adoption permitted, and is to be applied either in the period of adoption or retrospectively to each period in which the effect of the change in the U.S. federal corporate income tax rate in the Tax Reform Act is recognized. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of the new standard on the Company's Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

The Company and Basis of Presentation - Additional Information (Detail) - USD ($)	1 Months Ended		3 Months Ended		9 Months Ended		12 Months Ended
	Mar. 31, 2018	Mar. 31, 2016	Sep. 30, 2018	Sep. 30, 2017	Sep. 30, 2018	Sep. 30, 2017	Dec. 31, 2016	Dec. 31, 2017
Class of Stock [Line Items]
Proceeds from issuance of common stock, net of at-the-market offering commissions					$ 0	$ 38,760,000
Company's incorporation date					Aug. 10, 1999
Commencement date of operations					Jun. 30, 2002
Change of entity name date					Apr. 19, 2005
Net loss			$ 32,834,000	$ 30,651,000	$ 101,952,000	84,680,000
Net cash used in operating activities					73,105,000	$ 66,946,000
Working capital surplus			184,100,000		184,100,000
Accumulated deficit			644,158,000		644,158,000			$ 542,167,000
Cash, cash equivalents, and short-term investments			$ 208,400,000		$ 208,400,000			$ 282,900,000
Cash and cash equivalents, and investments, expected funding term for operating plan					12 months
At the Market Offering
Class of Stock [Line Items]
Aggregate authorized offering price		$ 75,000,000.0
Commission (percent)		3.00%
Issuance of common stock (in shares)						1,802,651
Proceeds from issuance of common stock, net of at-the-market offering commissions						$ 38,200,000
Proceeds from issuance of common stock, net of commissions and offering costs						38,800,000
Stock offering expenses						600,000
Stock offering expenses paid							$ 200,000
Unpaid stock offering costs				$ 400,000		$ 400,000
Controlled Equity Offering
Class of Stock [Line Items]
Aggregate authorized offering price	$ 125,000,000.0
Weighted Average \| At the Market Offering
Class of Stock [Line Items]
Offering price per share (in dollars per share)				$ 22.17		$ 22.17

Collaboration and License Revenue (Details) - USD ($) $ in Thousands		3 Months Ended	9 Months Ended
	Feb. 28, 2018	Sep. 30, 2018	Sep. 30, 2018	Dec. 31, 2017
Collaborative Arrangements and Non-collaborative Arrangement Transactions [Line Items]
Contract with Customer, Liability, Revenue Recognized		$ 2,400	$ 3,200
Deferred revenue, current portion		8,749	8,749	$ 0
Deferred revenue, net of current portion		13,009	13,009	$ 0
Mylan
Collaborative Arrangements and Non-collaborative Arrangement Transactions [Line Items]
Non-refundable upfront payment	$ 25,000
Contingent payments	100,000
Revenue maximum for receipt of tiered milestone payments	225,000
Revenue maximum for waiver of royalties	50,000
Transaction price	81,000
Remaining performance obligation		$ 78,600	$ 78,600
Development Milestones \| Mylan
Collaborative Arrangements and Non-collaborative Arrangement Transactions [Line Items]
Revenue maximum for receipt of tiered milestone payments	$ 40,000

Medicis Settlement - Additional Information (Detail) $ in Millions	1 Months Ended	9 Months Ended	12 Months Ended
	Oct. 31, 2012 USD ($)	Sep. 30, 2018 USD ($)	Dec. 31, 2014 USD ($)	Dec. 31, 2013 USD ($)
Medicis Pharmaceutical Corporation
Settlement And Termination [Line Items]
Settlement consideration payable	$ 25.0
Upfront payment paid	7.0
Medicis Pharmaceutical Corporation \| Proceeds Sharing Arrangement
Settlement And Termination [Line Items]
Settlement agreement, payable	$ 14.0
Settlement payment			$ 7.1	$ 6.9
Medicis Pharmaceutical Corporation \| Product Approval Payment Derivative
Settlement And Termination [Line Items]
Derivative liability for the Product Approval Payment		$ 2.8
Valeant Pharmaceuticals International, Inc. \| Product Approval Payment Derivative
Settlement And Termination [Line Items]
Accrued milestone obligations		$ 4.0
Measurement Input, Expected Term \| Medicis Pharmaceutical Corporation \| Product Approval Payment Derivative
Settlement And Termination [Line Items]
Remaining contractual term (in years)		1 year 9 months
Measurement Input, Risk Free Interest Rate \| Medicis Pharmaceutical Corporation \| Product Approval Payment Derivative
Settlement And Termination [Line Items]
Derivative liability, measurement input		0.0276
Measurement Input, Entity Credit Risk \| Medicis Pharmaceutical Corporation \| Product Approval Payment Derivative
Settlement And Termination [Line Items]
Derivative liability, measurement input		0.0600

Notes Payable and Financing Obligations	9 Months Ended
Notes Payable and Financing Obligations	Sep. 30, 2018
Debt Disclosure [Abstract]
Notes Payable and Financing Obligations	Notes Payable and Financing Obligations Essex Capital Notes On December 20, 2013, the Company signed a Loan and Lease Agreement (Original Agreement) to borrow up to $10.8 million in the form of Secured Promissory Notes from Essex Capital, or the Essex Notes, to finance the completion and installation of the Company’s RT001 topical commercial fill/finish line, or the Fill/Finish Line. In December 2013 and January 2014, the Company withdrew a total of $5.0 million under the terms of the Original Agreement. In May 2014, pursuant to the terms of the Original Agreement, the Company sold equipment to Essex Capital, resulting in partial settlement of the outstanding loan balance of $1.1 million, and leased the equipment back for fixed monthly payments to be paid over 3 years. On December 17, 2014, the Company entered into the First Amendment to the Loan and Lease Agreement (First Amendment) with Essex Capital. Under the terms of the First Amendment, the Company agreed to repay the outstanding debt balance of $3.9 million and issued a warrant to purchase 44,753 shares of common stock. In February 2015, the Company executed the Second Amendment to the Loan and Lease Agreement (Second Amendment), under which the term of the facility was extended to April 15, 2015 and the purchase price for the remainder of the equipment was increased by $0.1 million to approximately $9.8 million. Concurrently with this sale, the Company leased the equipment back from Essex Capital for a fixed monthly payment to be paid monthly over 3 years. None of the leases qualified for sale-leaseback accounting due to the Company’s continuing involvement in the equipment. Therefore, the Company accounted for these transactions as financing obligations using the effective interest rate method. The leases provide for the option to purchase the leased equipment for 10% of the original purchase amount and, in June 2015, the Company exercised its option to purchase the remainder of the equipment sold and leased back from Essex Capital for 10% of the original purchase amount, or approximately $1.1 million, at the conclusion of the lease terms. In May 2017, the Company paid $0.1 million to purchase the equipment sold and leased back from Essex Capital in May 2014. The Company paid principal and interest payments on the Essex Capital Lease of $0.9 million during the first quarter of 2018. In April 2018, the Company paid $1.0 million to purchase the remaining equipment sold and leased back, which excludes sales and use taxes paid, from Essex Capital and there are no remaining commitments or liabilities payable to Essex Capital.

Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Details) - USD ($) $ in Thousands	1 Months Ended	3 Months Ended		9 Months Ended		12 Months Ended
	Nov. 30, 2017	Sep. 30, 2018	Sep. 30, 2017	Sep. 30, 2018	Sep. 30, 2017	Dec. 31, 2017	Jan. 01, 2018
Revenue from External Customer [Line Items]
Adjustment to valuation allowance for change in deferred tax liabilities						$ (62,900)
Operating income (loss)		$ (33,641)	$ (30,716)	$ (104,231)	$ (84,643)
Royalty
Revenue from External Customer [Line Items]
Quarterly royalty revenue received from Precision Dermatology, Inc.	$ 75
Accounting Standards Update 2018-07
Revenue from External Customer [Line Items]
Cumulative effect of new accounting principle in period of adoption							$ 100
Accounting Standards Update 2018-05
Revenue from External Customer [Line Items]
Operating income (loss)				(39,600)
Deferred tax assets		$ 5,200		5,200
Estimated re-measurement of certain deferred taxes				$ 68,100

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets (Unaudited) (Parenthetical) - $ / shares	Sep. 30, 2018	Dec. 31, 2017
Statement of Financial Position [Abstract]
Common stock, par value (in usd per share)	$ 0.001	$ 0.001
Common stock, shares authorized (in shares)	95,000,000	95,000,000
Common stock, shares issued (in shares)	36,992,122	36,516,075
Common stock, shares outstanding (in shares)	36,992,122	36,516,075

Medicis Settlement	9 Months Ended
Medicis Settlement	Sep. 30, 2018
Commitments and Contingencies Disclosure [Abstract]
Medicis Settlement	Medicis Settlement In July 2009, the Company entered into a license agreement with Medicis Pharmaceutical Corporation, or Medicis, granting Medicis worldwide aesthetic and dermatological rights to the Company’s investigational botulinum toxin type A product candidates. In October 2012, the Company entered into a settlement and termination agreement with Medicis. The terms of the settlement provided for the reacquisition of the rights related to all territories of RT002 injectable and RT001 topical from Medicis and for consideration payable by the Company to Medicis of up to $25.0 million, comprised of (i) an upfront payment of $7.0 million, which was paid in 2012, (ii) a proceeds sharing arrangement payment of $14.0 million due upon specified capital raising achievements by the Company, of which $6.9 million was paid in 2013 and $7.1 million in 2014, and (iii) a product approval payment of $4.0 million to be paid upon the achievement of regulatory approval for RT002 injectable or RT001 topical by the Company. Medicis was subsequently acquired by Valeant Pharmaceuticals International, Inc. in December 2012. The Company determined that the settlement provisions related to the proceeds sharing arrangement payment in (ii) above and product approval payment in (iii) above were derivative instruments that require fair value accounting as a liability and periodic fair value remeasurements until settled. As of September 30, 2018, the Company determined the fair value of its liability for the product approval payment was $2.8 million, which was measured by assuming a term of 1.75 years, a risk-free rate of 2.76% and a credit risk adjustment of 6.00%. The Company’s assumption for the expected term is based on an expected Biologics License Application, or BLA, approval in 2020. The Company did not make any payments under the Product Approval Payment during the nine months ended September 30, 2018.

Cash Equivalents and Investments (Detail) - USD ($) $ in Thousands	Sep. 30, 2018	Dec. 31, 2017
Debt Securities, Available-for-sale [Line Items]
Cost	$ 200,966	$ 236,744
Gains	0	0
Losses	(133)	0
Fair Value	200,833	236,744
Cash equivalents
Debt Securities, Available-for-sale [Line Items]
Fair Value	37,573	236,744
Short-term investments
Debt Securities, Available-for-sale [Line Items]
Fair Value	163,260	0
Money market funds
Debt Securities, Available-for-sale [Line Items]
Cost	37,573	236,744
Gains	0	0
Losses	0	0
Fair Value	37,573	236,744
U.S. treasury securities
Debt Securities, Available-for-sale [Line Items]
Cost	100,243	0
Gains	0	0
Losses	(85)	0
Fair Value	100,158	0